Gladys and David Blank's Genealogy
Search People
Last Name:
First Name:
Home | What's New | Photos | Documents | Military
| Holocaust
| Histories | Headstones | Holocaust
| Places | Help English Help
 עזרה Hebrew Help
| Advanced Search

Rabbi Joel Sirkes

Male 1561 - 1640  (79 years)

  • Name Joel Sirkes 
    Prefix Rabbi 
    Born 1561 
    Gender Male 
    Biography Sirkes, Yo’el
    • Suggested Reading
    • Author
    (1561–1640), one of the foremost Talmudic scholars and halakhists of Poland, better known by the acronym Baḥ, after the abbreviation of his Bayit ḥadash commentary. Sirkes was born in Lublin to a distinguished rabbinic family and served as rabbi in the prominent communities of Brest Litovsk and Kraków, where he also headed a yeshiva. He was an active participant in the Council of Four Lands and attended numerous fairs where he was involved in halakhic deliberations.

    Sirkes taught a number of prominent students, including Menaḥem Mendel Krochmal (author of Tsemaḥ tsedek) and Menaḥem Mendel Auerbach (author of ‘Ateret zekenim). However, his most renowned disciple was his son-in-law, David ben Shemu’el ha-Levi (Taz), author of the authoritative commentary to the Shulḥan ‘arukh entitled Ture zahav.

    Sirkes’s literary contributions include a commentary to the Book of Ruth entitled Meshiv nefesh and a commentary to Mosheh Cordovero’s Pardes rimonim. His acumen in analyzing texts is most evident in the numerous hagahot (critical glosses and notes) that he appended to the Talmud, Rashi, Tosafot, and Asheri. He also wrote more than 250 responsa.

    Sirkes’s Bayit ḥadash (published in four parts, 1631–1640) on the Arba‘ah turim of Ya‘akov ben Asher is an extensive work in which he frequently responds to Yosef Karo’s commentary Bet Yosef, which had been published in 1555. For all its thoroughness, the Bet Yosef is not a full commentary on the Turim, and Sirkes criticizes Karo for having neglected many specific rulings. Sirkes was likewise ambivalent toward the publication of Karo’s Shulḥan ‘arukh; he worried that Karo’s writing would detract readers from the study of Talmud. Sirkes also fiercely defended the sanctity of Kabbalah: he referred to it as the “very source and essence of Torah” and was antagonistic to all philosophical study, equating it with heresy.

    Sirkes’s responsa collection provides a rich source of illumination on the social and economic conditions of the Polish–Lithuanian world that he served, as well as on the nature of Jewish–gentile relations. One of his responsa, later censored by the Christian authorities, deals with the case of a Jew who was martyred for allegedly stealing a small statue of Jesus (or possibly the Host); the gentile authorities accordingly demanded the surrender of another Jew accused of receiving the stolen item from the martyr. The entire Jewish communal leadership of Kalish (Kalisz) was threatened with extermination if they refused to surrender the individual. Sirkes held that the community was permitted to surrender the individual if it was indeed verified that he had run off with the martyr’s purse. Sirkes also dealt with cases of apostasy from Judaism, accusing converts of material motives. He wrote, “It is common knowledge at present that the majority of apostates have converted solely out of their lust for robbery, promiscuity, and consuming forbidden foods in public.”

    Both Sirkes’s responsa collection and his Bayit ḥadash testify to his opposition to undue religious stringencies, a view expressed in his statement, “He who wishes to be stringent, let him be stringent for himself only.” Indeed, he admitted that in his younger years he had been more severe in his judgments, but with the passage of time had become increasingly sensitive to the admonition that “the Torah is most concerned over the financial needs of Israel” and he therefore strove to be more permissive.

    Some of Sirkes’s noteworthy leniencies permitted the reading of secular books during the Sabbath, including books not written in Hebrew, and allowing Jewish physicians to violate the Sabbath when treating non-Jewish patients, notably those of high station, even when the illnesses were not severe. Broadly interpreting the statement of the Mishnah that “there is no difference between festivals and Sabbath save only in the matter of [preparing] food,” he relaxed some of the prohibitions against cooking on festival days. In addition, he excused people sensitive to colds or those lacking warm clothing from the obligation to dwell in booths during Sukkot, and permitted women to dress in men’s clothing during extreme weather conditions when this type of attire was more comfortable. Finally, Sirkes was lenient in approving the use of secular melodies for synagogue chants, and even permitted church melodies to be used, provided they were not indigenous to the church service.
    Suggested Reading
    Mordecai Kossover, “Rabbi Joel Sirkes,” Bitzaron 14 (1946): 23–31; Samuel Mirsky, “Rab Joel Sirkes Baal HaBaH,” Horeb 6 (1942): 41–75; Elijah Judah Schochet, Bach B Rabbi Joel Sirkes: His Life, Works, and Times (Jerusalem and New York, 1971).
    Elijah J. Schochet
    The unedited full-text of the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia

    Ulpan La-Inyan
    Discover Hebrew
    A Hebrew-learning
    experience focused
    on the skills you need.


    search tips & recommendations




    By: Executive Committee of the Editorial Board., Bernhard Friedberg
    Polish rabbi; born at Lublin in 1561; died at Cracow, 1640. At the age of fourteen he was sent to the yeshibah of Solomon ben Judah. After remaining there some time he went to Brest-Litovsk, where he attended the yeshibah of R. Phoebus. While still a youth he was invited to the rabbinate of Pruszany, near Slonim. Later he occupied the rabbinates of Lubkow, Lublin, Miedzyboz, Beldza, Szydlowka, and finally Brest-Litovsk and Cracow, succeeding in each of the two last-mentioned places his teacher R. Phoebus. He was an adherent of the Cabala and an opponent of both pilpul and philosophy.
    Sirkes wrote: "Meshib Nefesh," commentary on the Book of Ruth (Lublin, 1616); "Bayit Ḥadash," commentary on the "Arba'ah Ṭurim" of Jacob ben Asher (Cracow, 1631-40); "She'elotu-Teshubot Bayit Ḥadash" (Frankfort, 1697); "She'elot u-Teshubot Bet Ḥadash ha-Ḥadashot" (Koretz, 1785); "Haggahot," on all the tractates of the Babylonian Talmud; and "Rosh," first published, from a manuscript, in the Warsaw (1860) edition of the Talmud, and included in almost every subsequent edition thereof.
    In the "Bayit Ḥadash" the evident intention of the author is to present and elucidate the fundamental principles of the Law as recorded in the Mishnah, the Babylonian and Jerusalem Talmuds, and the chief codes.
    • J. M. Zunz, 'Ir ha-Ẓedeḳ, p. 62, Lemberg, 1874;
    • Güdemann, Quellenschriften zur Gesch. des Unterrichts, p. 232, Berlin, 1891;
    • R. N. Rabbinoviez, He'arot we-Tiḳḳunim, p. 9, Lyck, 1875;
    • B. Friedberg, Gesch. der Hebr. Typographie in Krakau, p. 27, Cracow, 1900;
    • idem, Epitaphien von Grabsteinen des Israelitischen Friedhofes zu Krakau, Nebst Biographischen Skizzen, p. 14, Drohobycz, 1897;
    • Ch. N. Dembitzer, Kelilat Yofi, part ii., p. 18b, Cracow, 1893;
    • B. Katz, Le-Ḳorot ha-Yehudim, Berlin, 1899.

    Died 1640 
    Person ID I2879  Blank Family
    Last Modified 7 Feb 2021 

    Father Shmuel Jaffe 
    Family ID F312  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart

© This Site Copyright David Blank 2008-2021
This site powered by The Next Generation of Genealogy Sitebuilding ©, v. 13.0, written by Darrin Lythgoe 2001-2021.

Send me eMail